What made you look for non-import? Please tell us where you read or heard it (including the quote, if possible). The impact of the Boston non-import agreement and all similar agreements has been considerable. About 60 merchants and merchants signed the agreement on August 1, 1768, and within two weeks, all but sixteen Boston merchants, merchants and business owners had joined the boycott. Boston craftsmen, craftsmen and other merchants signed the agreement with joy in the hope that the boycott would generate business for them. In the space of weeks and months, almost all ports and regions of the Thirteen Colonies adopted similar boycotts to protest and undermine the Townshend Revenue Act, although many merchants and traders in the South with loyalist tendencies refused to cooperate. Smuggling was widespread in the colonies. The effects of British merchants who acted with the American colonies were alarming. Traders lost money that shipped their goods to the colonies, where they would not be received. Most of the time, the goods were never left ashore. If they were, they would rot on the docks or in warehouses, or were looted by the settlers. The situation was a nightmare for customs officers who could not collect taxes on goods that were not left ashore or were never sold.
NONIMPORTATION AGREEMENTS were a series of trade restrictions introduced by American settlers to protest british income policy before the American Revolution. The British Stamp Act of 1765 triggered the first non-import agreements. In protest at the unrepresentation tax, New York merchants agreed to a collective embargo on British imports until Parliament lifted stamp duty, and they persuaded traders in Boston and Philadelphia to do the same. Under pressure from British exporters who lost their business, Parliament repealed the Stamp Act within a year. Non-import agreements have not only contributed to the upsurriving of undesirable behaviour, but have also contributed to lower exchange rates and the clearing of inventories filled with importers. These figures show the impact of the situation on trade. There was a great depression in the 1760s, when the majority of non-import and taxation battles fought. Nevertheless, it is assumed that non-importation and the resulting depression were not only caused by unpopular acts.
During this period, creditors and the investor asked for their money from colonial importers who were unable to repay their debts. To raise more money, they made the non-import so that they could sell their shares at higher prices. Although Sons of Liberty`s involvement was indisputable in the affairs of the non-import agreements, they were not the only ones opposing British rule. At the time without British luxury goods, tea or textiles, there seemed to be an opportunity for patriotic women to play a role in public affairs.  Although they did not join the public protest, they formed a strong group called Daughters of Liberty. Instead, they contributed to the manufacture of products when non-import agreements came into force and led to deficits in British products, particularly textiles. They spin yarn and knit yarn into fabric.  They also decided to join the initiative to boycott English tea, instead using various herbs and plants such as mint or raspberry. Often, these women run either a household or even a small store. This allowed them to choose the goods they wanted to buy and the goods they wanted to boycott.
As a result, they have had a huge impact on non-imports and their effectiveness.